Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP Human Capital Management (SAP ERP HCM)
Viewing all 10028 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Missing Recruitment Configuration

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I assume that the issue is where the settings you are maintained in the PB30 transaction in the sense the set of info types maintained in recruitment module is not getting reflected in PA30 transaction.

 

While transferring the data from Recruitment module to Personnel administration through PBA7 transaction please check what action type you are selecting in the Action for hiring field.

 

Please check the settings for that  action type in the table T529A and also the corresponding info group attached with that action.

 

After getting the infogroup then check the info types in the infogroup in the table V_T588D and i guess here you must add all the infotypes to be transferred from Recruitment to Personnel administration module.

 

I think this will solve your issue.

 

Regards,

Mithun K


Re: PTARQ – Reject absence or presence e-mail returns empty

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Please check the screenshot below. On the box "Descripción" the information are empty, the workflow  is not getting the information of the request.

 

Do you know where I can set this?

 

 

Thanks!!

 

Regards,

Rodrigo

Re: HCM P&F WD FPM based Form : Approved Form in Editable

$
0
0

Yes.. I agree to that.

ways can be like Customization at WD component level or making button visible with WF Binding in approve step.

what happens to a transport if the path is not set up?

$
0
0

Hi experts,

Sorry for putting this question in PA/OM forum. I could not figure out forum for this. you are more than welcome to move the question to the correct forum.

We are in the realization phase and I configured and released a transport (from DEV 100 to 300) which I should not have. Out transport path is not set up in the DEV system. What happens to the transports in this scenario where the path not set up? Is there a chance to recover that transport or pick it up and move to the correct client.

 

Thanks,

Juliana..

Re: MSS setup for substitution

Re: what happens to a transport if the path is not set up?

$
0
0

Hi Juliana,

 

once you release a transport, 2 files are created on the SAP server (cofile and datafile).  They are not lost, but saved on the SAP server.  If the transport path is not configured correctly however, they are not added to the import queue of the receiving system.

 

What I would do in order to recover is to create a new transport with the same contents as the transport you just released. 

 

You can do this in transaction SE10 => create (F6) => transport of copies => enter short description => save.

 

In the next screen, go to 'request/task' => object list => include objects

 

From there you can enter the number of the transport you just released and all the object should be added automatically to your new transport.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Kr,

 

Tom

Re: getting runtime error in production HCM

$
0
0


Hi Hari,here is the enrire dump...

 

Category               ABAP Programming Error

Runtime Errors         UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION

Except.                CX_HRPA_INVALID_PARAMETER

ABAP Program           SAPFP50P

Application Component  PA-PA

Date and Time          05.12.2013 08:54:41

What happened?

    The exception 'CX_HRPA_INVALID_PARAMETER' was raised, but it was not caught  anywhere along      the call hierarchy.

Since exceptions represent error situations and this error was not adequately responded to, the running ABAP program     'CL_HRPA_RESOLVE_EXCEPTION=====CP' has to be  terminated.

Error analysis

    An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.

    The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_HRPA_INVALID_PARAMETER', was not   caught in

    procedure "RESOLVE_EXCEPTION" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.

    Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the

    exception would occur, the current program is terminated.

    The reason for the exception is:

    Invalid parameter EXCEPTION, value

   The occurrence of the exception is closely related to the occurrence of

    a previous exception "CX_HRPA_VIOLATED_PRECONDITION", which was raised in the

     program "CL_HRPA_MASTERDATA_FACTORY====CP",

    specifically in line 6 of the (include) program  "CL_HRPA_MASTERDATA_FACTORY====CM004".

 

  The cause of the exception was:

  Precondition Violated

If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to

find an interim solution in an SAP Note.

If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following

keywords:

"UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION" "CX_HRPA_INVALID_PARAMETER"

"CL_HRPA_RESOLVE_EXCEPTION=====CP" or "CL_HRPA_RESOLVE_EXCEPTION=====CM001"

"RESOLVE"

User and Transaction
    Client.............. 121
    User................ "BHAGUDIAN"
    Language key........ "E"
    Transaction......... " "
    Transaction ID...... "26da25d4623311e3bc0e000000dcaa6e"

    EPP Whole Context ID.... "26DA25D4623311E3BC0E000000DCAA6E"
    EPP Connection ID....... "09B39DE0623211E3B3BDF13F0A0AF656"
    EPP Caller Counter...... 298

    Program............. "CL_HRPA_RESOLVE_EXCEPTION=====CP"
    Screen.............. "SAPMSSY1 3004"
    Screen Line......... 2
    Debugger Active..... "none"

Chain of Exception Objects

Attrib. Name                   Value

Level    1     Class    CX_HRPA_INVALID_PARAMETER
Program  CL_HRPA_RESOLVE_EXCEPTION=====CP Include  CL_HRPA_RESOLVE_EXCEPTION=====CM001 Row   80
Short Te Invalid parameter EXCEPTION, value
Long Tex

IS_RESUMABLE
KERNEL_ERRID
PARAMETER                      EXCEPTION
VALUE

Level    2     Class    CX_HRPA_VIOLATED_PRECONDITION
Program  CL_HRPA_MASTERDATA_FACTORY====CP Include  CL_HRPA_MASTERDATA_FACTORY====CM004 Row   6
Short Te Precondition Violated
Long Tex

IS_RESUMABLE
KERNEL_ERRID

Information on where terminated
    Termination occurred in the ABAP program "CL_HRPA_RESOLVE_EXCEPTION=====CP" -
     in "RESOLVE".
    The main program was "SAPMSSY1 ".

    In the source code you have the termination point in line 80
    of the (Include) program "CL_HRPA_RESOLVE_EXCEPTION=====CM001".
    The termination is caused because exception "CX_HRPA_INVALID_PARAMETER"
     occurred in
    procedure "RESOLVE_EXCEPTION" "(FORM)", but it was neither handled locally nor
     declared
    in the RAISING clause of its signature.

    The procedure is in program "SAPFP50P "; its source code begins in line
    2139 of the (Include program "FP50PE10 ".

Source Code Extract (Source code has changed)

Line  SourceCde

   50             message_handler = message_handler.
   51         return.
   52
   53       catch cx_sy_move_cast_error.
   54     endtry.
   55   END-OF-DEFINITION.
   56
   57
   58   try_to resolve_missing_infty_data    cx_hrpa_missing_infty_data.
   59   try_to resolve_missing_authorization cx_hrpa_missing_authorization.
   60   try_to resolve_invalid_feature       cx_hrpa_invalid_feature.
   61   try_to resolve_unexpected_message    cx_hrpa_unexpected_message.
   62   try_to resolve_missing_personid      cx_hrpa_missing_personid.
   63   try_to resolve_invalid_infotype_db   cx_hrpa_invalid_infotype_db.
   64   try_to resolve_invalid_customization cx_hrpa_invalid_customization.
   65   try_to resolve_inconsistent_database cx_hrpa_inconsistent_database.
   66
   67
   68 * Just to ensure the macro can be used nowhere else.
   69   DEFINE try_to.
   70   END-OF-DEFINITION.
   71

   72 * If we can not remap we would like to just re-raise the

   73 * exception like below like "RAISE EXCEPTION exception.".

   74 * Unfortunately the kernel will then forget about the

   75 * original source position.

   76

   77 * So this is the fallback strategy. Calling this method

   78 * is only allowed if the exception can be resolved. Since

   79 * this is not the case we indicate a parameter violation.

>>>>>   RAISE EXCEPTION TYPE cx_hrpa_invalid_parameter

   81     EXPORTING

   82       previous  = exception

   83       parameter = 'EXCEPTION'.

   84

   85 ENDMETHOD.

 

 

Thanks

Arun

Re: IT0003 - Payroll correction field

$
0
0

hi Upendra,

Recently we applied the support pack level 66. While doing testing we cannot save the payroll correction run indicator using PU03. would you please help me on this?


Re: Integration of SAP on Cloud with Kronos

$
0
0

Atul,

 

Are you referring to Work force central integrating with SAP On premise and SAP on Cloud ?

 

Workforce central can integrate with SAP On premise  and SAP on cloud.

 

I have worked on Kronos/On premise integration using flat files though standard API is avaliable now.

 

Just started on a project where there is SAP Cloud Payroll with Kronos and we are using API that is avaliable .We are integrating both SAP cloud payroll and also SF.

 

regards

 

Harris

Re: SuccessFactors & integration with SAP outsourced Payroll

$
0
0

Hi Luke,

 

Many thanks for your reply. It has been a while but we spoke in the past regarding Nakisa for a previous customer.

 

Just to clarify, the scenario is the following.

 

- Currently all HR data sits in an on premise SAP system

- Currently have an outsourcing agreement with a Payroll provider to run Payroll Gross to Net on a SAP system

- Interface exists between on premise client SAP and Providers SAP instance

 

Future state:

 

- Customer is considering moving all HR data to SF EC as the go forward solution

- To limit complexity but mainly to get over potential data privacy related issues only migrate the core data to SF and leave country specific data only required for Payroll, only maintained in Payroll Providers system

 

Based on what you have said above you are suggesting that all payroll relevant fields could be housed in SF EC? Reason I ask is because I have not yet had backend access to validate if all the relevant country Payroll specific data indeed has a "home" in EC good examples might be "Church Tax" in germany or religion in Switzerland or the various fields relating to Equal opportunities reporting etc. Having read your recent book, my understanding was that SAP HCM had a much higher granularity of fields than EC but perhaps that is not the case?

 

Is there any documentation identifying which fields in EC are transfered by the standard integration using Boomi to an SAP on premise system already set up out of the box?

 

Lastly would you see any issues in this hybrid maintenance approach as detailed above?

 

Many thanks again,

 

Kind regards,


Dan

Re: IT0003 - Payroll correction field

$
0
0

Yes you are correct! the field is grayed out we cannot change that.

 

Usually i do Payroll correction like this

PA30->Utilities->change payroll status-> Extras->set correction run then save the entry.Payroll correction indicator will be checked.

 

After applying the Support Pack, when we were trying to test the payroll correction by this method and it is not saving the entry.We ran the match code for the entries that they flagged and it was not correcting the changes.  Is this happening because of SP? Why i can't do it by this method after installing the SP?

 

i can do it by runnig the program RPUTRBK0.

Re: IT0003 - Payroll correction field

$
0
0

Dear Rose,

 

For correction in IT 0003 u can go through IT 0003 Utility and change Payroll status. But here u will get some filled in gray. To get edit into all fields in IT 0003 go to T code PU03.

 

Thanks and regards,

 

Baidyanath

Re: PTARQ – Reject absence or presence e-mail returns empty

$
0
0

Hi Rodrigo,

 

Good that you found the E-mail text in that you need to check the class from where you are getting the three values &BEGDA&,&ENDDA& and &AUSENTISMO&.

 

First let me tell you the basic concepts in workflow template all the dynamic values in the E-mail body will be coming from the Container. - Refer Fig 1 & 2.

 

Against each task in the workflow there will be class attached where the values required will be fetched from the various methods inside the class. - Refer Fig 3 & 4.

Fig 4.jpg

I hope the problem is with the class and the method from which the values are getting fetched &BEGDA&,&ENDDA& and &AUSENTISMO&.

 

Hope the above information will solve your issue.

 

Regards,

Mithun K

Evaluation Path for find Manager's reports the belong to sub org unit

$
0
0


Hello Experts,

 

We are trying to setup a custom substitution solution in MSS for time approvals and in order to do that we needed to change a couple evaluation paths.

 

Currently if Manager A is a substitute for Manager B, Manager A sees Manager B's direct reports, which is fine. The problem is Manager A does NOT see Manager B's direct reports which are Managers of their own sub org unit (chief position).

 

What we don't want either is if Manager A sees Manager B's direct reports that are chiefs of their own org units BUT also see those chiefs direct reports as well (two levels down).

 

Below is the evaluation path we are working with and example of employees we want to select.

 

Evaluation Path: SBESX

NoObjTypA/BRelat'shipRelat'ship NamePriorityRel ObjTyp
10OB003Incorporates*S
20SA008Holder**
30OB002Is line supervisor of*O

 

Example of employees we want in yellow, and employees we dont want in red.

org.jpg

 

Can anyone please tell me how I can achieve this with the above evaluation path? I either get too many employees or not enough.

 

Thank you for any help,

Peter

Re: PCR for Absence Days from Infotype 2001

$
0
0

The list of Absence Days exist in Table AB of the Payroll Results Cluster.

That should be the source of the information to print on the Remuneration Statement since it enables you to identify when it was paid (in PP) and for when (for PP).

Ask your ABAP resource to help you in that task as you'll probably need some custom code.


Re: Anzeigen Variantenkatalog

$
0
0

Hi Andi,

 

du kannst hier nicht einfach deutsch schreiben, du verwirrst die Kollegen ja völlig Willkommen jedenfalls

 

Back on topic. As you know I have sadly no expertise in HCM and do not understand the context of your question, but since it seems your question is not answered yet, just a short idea: could a code inspection of appropriate transaction give you a clue where the default value comes from?

 

Viele Grüsse nach Kowelenz

Re: HCM P&F WD FPM based Form : Approved Form in Editable

$
0
0

Implemented note. But fields still not in editable mode.

Re: PTARQ – Reject absence or presence e-mail returns empty

$
0
0

Hi Mithun K,

 

Thanks for your help.

 

We are debugging and we found the correct values according to the screenshot below:

 

 

But on the Workflow log the fields get the parameter "No fijado". See the screen below:

 

 

 

How and where can we set to turn back the correct values?

 

Thanks!!

 

Regards,

Rodrigo

MSS Add-on Side by Side Comparison is blank

$
0
0

Dear Friends,

 

From the Detail Team view screen you can compare employees or org units.  And I remember when I dragged employees into the slots at the top, I used to see the detailed comparison.  Now I don't see anything; the screen is blank with only the short profile on the left.   What have I done wrong?

 

Thanks

Pascal

Re: Payroll PCR

$
0
0

Hi Deepan,

 

For your scenario i think no need to write any PCR go through below table wage type characteristics

 

Go to table SM30:- T511 In this table you can maintain number or unit & Maximum amount or minimum amount

 

T511.png

Still if you have any doubts kindly let me know

 

Keep smiling

Mohan

Viewing all 10028 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>